Skip to main content

Robert W. Wood
President Elect Trump and Republicans say big tax changes are coming. It’s about time. The U.S. tax code is the most complex in the world, chock full of perks to special interests and social engineering. It is incomprehensible, and often produces unjust results. In 1913, our entire tax law was 27 pages. It’s now over 4 million words, 9,000 bloated pages. From 2001-2012 alone, there were 4,600 changes, more than one a day.

Individuals spend 6.1 billion hours a year doing their tax filings, the equivalent of a year’s work for 3 million full-time workers. Many Fortune 500 companies manage to pay zero tax or get refunds. of 145 million personal tax returns in 2011, 54 million (more than a third) had zero tax liability or got refunds. 1,600 people who filed tax returns with incomes of $1 million or more paid no income taxes.

Here are just a few of the thousands of things that should be addressed:
1. The Earned Income Tax Credit is plagued by fraud, up to 29% of all payments. The IRS paid out $125 billion in fraudulent refunds in the last 10 years, over $12 billion a year. How about  allowing American families to keep more of their own money, instead of taking and ineffectively distributing it, losing billions to fraud?
2. The alternative minimum tax–usually shortened to AMT–is a kind of tax rubik’s cube. It is a complex parallel tax system that has grown like cancer. It’s results are hard to predict and can be perverse. It was designed to target certain rich tax deductions and to add them back for a kind of minimum tax computation. But over four decades it applies to vast numbers of deductions and is grossly unfair. If you win a lawsuit and pay contingent legal fees, you can end up taxed on more money than you received. AMT can ruin your stock options too.
3. Private equity and hedge fund owners get a “carried interest” for their work. Their pay looks like wages, but it is taxed at capital gain rates. Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump said they would eliminate it, so finally this sacred cow could actually go. Even so, fund managers contend firmly that time, effort, and risk are really capital investments. If they are, perhaps the wages that all American workers get should be taxed as capital gains too.
4. Our tax exempt organization rules need reform. Some tax-exempt charities end up giving little to their causes. Using names like “Find the Children,” “The Veterans Fund,” and “Cancer Fund of America,” one report said that the 50 worst charities in America raised $1.3 billion in donations over the last 10 years. Yet almost none of this money benefited missing children, wounded veterans, or cancer patients. Cancer Fund of America spent less than 1% of donations on charitable activities. Over 10 years, it paid $5 million to its founder’s family and spent $80 million on hired fundraisers, but gave only $890,000 to cancer patients. There are plenty of good charities, of course, but the rules need reform. Many other classifications of tax exempt organizations should be reformed too. Despite millions in profits and revenue, the NFL, NHL, and PGA Tour are classified as non-profits, exempting their earnings from federal income taxes. They avoid paying millions in taxes but they pay out million-dollar salaries.
5. Then there are tax rates. U.S. corporate tax rates are the highest in the developed world. To avoid paying them, big U.S. companies keep their income abroad. U.S. multinational corporations kept $2.1 trillion abroad in 2013. General Electric stashed $110 billion overseas; Microsoft $76 billion; and Pfizer $69 billion. Americans lose out on all that capital. President elect Trump wants to bring it back. But note that unlike big companies that can avoid U.S. taxes on money stashed overseas, U.S. persons living abroad have to report and pay U.S. tax globally. And FATCA means that
foreign banks often turn away American accounts entirely–dealing with American tax law is just too complex. Many expats suffer, and some are so fed up they renounce their U.S. citizenship.
6. Many tax credits do not actually benefit the people they are targeted to help. For example, the New Markets Tax Credit was meant to create jobs in low income areas. Instead, it has reportedly steered nearly $1 billion to wealthy investors and Wall Street banks. Similarly, the Research and Development Tax Credit was meant to encourage mid-sized companies to increase R&D. Nevertheless, 80% has reportedly gone to huge companies like Google, Intel, Boeing and Apple.

7. Then, there is the estate tax. Whether you make a lot or a little over your lifetime, the notion of paying income taxes throughout life and then a death tax too seems wrong. It’s a reason that  Trump could finally kill the death tax.

These are only a few provisions, mind you. There are thousands of pages of tax law needing reform. Although some parts of our tax law make sense, many do not or lead to abuses. Besides, they inject a level of complexity that no one would wish upon anyone. We need a better, simpler, fairer and flatter tax system. A flat tax or simple tax might not be perfectly fair, and might not improve everything. But is there any way to go but up?
This article was written by Robert W. Wood from Forbes and was legally licensed by AdvisorStream through the NewsCred publisher network.

Important Disclosure Information

Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results.  Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by Dechtman Wealth Management, LLC [“DWM”]), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly in this blog will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful.  Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions.  Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this blog serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from DWM. To the extent that a reader has any questions regarding the applicability of any specific issue discussed above to his/her individual situation, he/she is encouraged to consult with the professional advisor of his/her choosing. DWM is neither a law firm nor a certified public accounting firm and no portion of the blog content should be construed as legal or accounting advice. A copy of the DWM’s current written disclosure Brochure discussing our advisory services and fees is available for review upon request or at

Please Note: DWM does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to DWM’s web site or blog or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility for any such content. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.

Please Remember: If you are a DWM client, please contact DWM, in writing, if there are any changes in your personal/financial situation or investment objectives for the purpose of reviewing/evaluating/revising our previous recommendations and/or services, or if you would like to impose, add, or to modify any reasonable restrictions to our investment advisory services.  Unless, and until, you notify us, in writing, to the contrary, we shall continue to provide services as we do currently.

Please Also Remember to advise us if you have not been receiving account statements (at least quarterly) from the account custodian.

Join our newsletter

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.